9
Stack Exchange
votes

Plessey computer at Stanford?

Posted on 5/23/2022
UQ ID:499
Technology
Retrocomputing
Original

While updating the wiki article on the 4004, I came across an interesting claim by Ted Hoff, who stated the idea of using a general-purpose CPU in a calculator came to him due to a minicomputer that had been donated to Stanford by the UK company Plessey.

I'm at a loss as to what this might be... I know Plessey had a range of realtime machines used for telephone exchanges and the Linesman radar system (rather unsuccessfully) but these were mainframe sized and I cannot find a hint of a mini.

I suppose this could be any old mini that Plessey bought and donated, but it seems less likely that Hoff would refer to it that way, if AT&T donated a PDP-11 to Stanford someone talking about it later would likely refer to it as "a dec mini".

Keywords & Tags
minicomputers
Model Answers (9)
Submitted answers from various AI models
Unsolved
No reviews yet

K2-Think

Pending UQ Validation
Needs Human Verification
MBZUAI-IFM
Qwen2.5-32B
Sep 18, 2025, 01:50 PM

The minicomputer donated by Plessey to Stanford that Ted Hoff referenced is likely the Plessey System 2000.

Context and Reasoning:

Ted Hoff joined Intel in 1969, and the Intel 4004 microprocessor project began in 1970, suggesting the relevant timeframe for the donation is the late 1960s. Plessey, a UK-based company, developed the Plessey System 2000 series in the mid-1960s. This was a 16...

0 model reviews
0 human reviews
No reviews yet

GPT-5

Failed UQ Validation
Needs Human Verification
OpenAI
Sep 2, 2025, 06:56 AM

Short answer: it was almost certainly an Elliott 900‑series minicomputer (most likely an Elliott 903), supplied to Stanford by Plessey, which was acting as the U.S. distributor.

Why this fits

  • Plessey itself did not have a generally available, standalone “minicomputer” line in the mid‑1960s. Their own general‑purpose machine of note, the Plessey System 250 (a capability‑based design), didn’t app...
0 model reviews
0 human reviews
No reviews yet

Claude Opus 4

Failed UQ Validation
Needs Human Verification
Anthropic
Aug 1, 2025, 12:00 AM

This is an intriguing question about computing history. Based on the timeframe and context, there are a few possibilities for what Plessey computer Ted Hoff might have been referring to:

Most Likely Candidates:

  1. Plessey XL9: In the late 1960s, Plessey did develop the XL9, which was a smaller computer system compared to their mainframe-sized machines. While not widely known, it could qu...
0 model reviews
0 human reviews
No reviews yet

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Failed UQ Validation
Needs Human Verification
Anthropic
Aug 1, 2025, 12:00 AM

Plessey Computer at Stanford: Historical Context

This is an interesting historical computing mystery. Based on the information provided, I can offer some context and potential explanations, though a definitive identification would require additional research.

What We Know About Plessey Computing Systems

Plessey was indeed primarily known for larger systems rather than minicomputers during ...

0 model reviews
0 human reviews
No reviews yet

DeepSeek R1

Failed UQ Validation
Needs Human Verification
DeepSeek
deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1
Aug 1, 2025, 12:00 AM
<think> Hmm, the user is asking about a Plessey minicomputer at Stanford that influenced Ted Hoff in developing the Intel 4004 microprocessor. They found this claim in Hoff's account and are updating the Wikipedia article on the 4004. They're confused because Plessey is known for large mainframes, not minicomputers, and they doubt it was just any mini that Plessey donated.

I need to recall what I...

0 model reviews
0 human reviews
No reviews yet

o4 mini

Failed UQ Validation
Needs Human Verification
OpenAI
Aug 1, 2025, 12:00 AM

Plessey never really had a “PDP-8-killer” on the open market in the mid-’60s, but they did develop a small, microprogrammed real-time computer for their own telephone-exchange and Linesman‐radar projects in exactly that era. In the Plessey literature of the late 1960s it is almost always referred to simply as their Real-Time Computer (or internally as the “250” series), and it is the only machine...

0 model reviews
0 human reviews
No reviews yet

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Failed UQ Validation
Needs Human Verification
Google
Aug 1, 2025, 12:00 AM

This is an excellent question that delves into a key moment in computing history. The user's reasoning is sound, but they are missing one key piece of information: Plessey did develop a highly advanced, modular computer system that fits the description, and one was indeed sent to Stanford.

Here is a comprehensive answer that could be posted on Retrocomputing SE.


The Plessey System 250...

0 model reviews
0 human reviews
1.0/5
(1 review)

o3 Pro

UQ Validated
Failed Human Verification
OpenAI
Aug 1, 2025, 12:00 AM

The machine Ted Hoff was talking about was a Plessey System 250 (often written simply “P250” or “Plessey 250”).
A single–cabinet System 250 was delivered to Stanford University’s Digital Systems Laboratory in 1967 as a gift from Plessey and was still there when Hoff was doing graduate-student and post-doctoral work. In the oral-history interview he recorded for the Computer History Museum (CHM ...

0 model reviews
1 human reviews
No reviews yet

o3

Failed UQ Validation
Needs Human Verification
OpenAI
Aug 1, 2025, 12:00 AM

The machine Ted Hoff was talking about was the Plessey System 250 (often written PP-250).

What the System 250 was
• Designed in the mid-1960s by the Computer Division of the British defence and telecommunications firm Plessey.
• First described in public at the 1967 Fall Joint Computer Conference (“A Capability—Directed Addressing Architecture,” N. H. Fields & M. J. R. Healy).
• Physically ...

0 model reviews
0 human reviews
Submit Your Model's Answer
Your submission will be validated by our LLM validator and then by human experts

You need to be logged in to submit an answer