Plessey computer at Stanford?
Plessey computer at Stanford?
While updating the wiki article on the 4004, I came across an interesting claim by Ted Hoff, who stated the idea of using a general-purpose CPU in a calculator came to him due to a minicomputer that had been donated to Stanford by the UK company Plessey.
I'm at a loss as to what this might be... I know Plessey had a range of realtime machines used for telephone exchanges and the Linesman radar system (rather unsuccessfully) but these were mainframe sized and I cannot find a hint of a mini.
I suppose this could be any old mini that Plessey bought and donated, but it seems less likely that Hoff would refer to it that way, if AT&T donated a PDP-11 to Stanford someone talking about it later would likely refer to it as "a dec mini".
K2-Think
The minicomputer donated by Plessey to Stanford that Ted Hoff referenced is likely the Plessey System 2000.
Context and Reasoning:
Ted Hoff joined Intel in 1969, and the Intel 4004 microprocessor project began in 1970, suggesting the relevant timeframe for the donation is the late 1960s. Plessey, a UK-based company, developed the Plessey System 2000 series in the mid-1960s. This was a 16...
GPT-5
Short answer: it was almost certainly an Elliott 900‑series minicomputer (most likely an Elliott 903), supplied to Stanford by Plessey, which was acting as the U.S. distributor.
Why this fits
- Plessey itself did not have a generally available, standalone “minicomputer” line in the mid‑1960s. Their own general‑purpose machine of note, the Plessey System 250 (a capability‑based design), didn’t app...
Claude Opus 4
This is an intriguing question about computing history. Based on the timeframe and context, there are a few possibilities for what Plessey computer Ted Hoff might have been referring to:
Most Likely Candidates:
- Plessey XL9: In the late 1960s, Plessey did develop the XL9, which was a smaller computer system compared to their mainframe-sized machines. While not widely known, it could qu...
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Plessey Computer at Stanford: Historical Context
This is an interesting historical computing mystery. Based on the information provided, I can offer some context and potential explanations, though a definitive identification would require additional research.
What We Know About Plessey Computing Systems
Plessey was indeed primarily known for larger systems rather than minicomputers during ...
DeepSeek R1
I need to recall what I...
o4 mini
Plessey never really had a “PDP-8-killer” on the open market in the mid-’60s, but they did develop a small, microprogrammed real-time computer for their own telephone-exchange and Linesman‐radar projects in exactly that era. In the Plessey literature of the late 1960s it is almost always referred to simply as their Real-Time Computer (or internally as the “250” series), and it is the only machine...
Gemini 2.5 Pro
This is an excellent question that delves into a key moment in computing history. The user's reasoning is sound, but they are missing one key piece of information: Plessey did develop a highly advanced, modular computer system that fits the description, and one was indeed sent to Stanford.
Here is a comprehensive answer that could be posted on Retrocomputing SE.
The Plessey System 250...
o3 Pro
The machine Ted Hoff was talking about was a Plessey System 250 (often written simply “P250” or “Plessey 250”).
A single–cabinet System 250 was delivered to Stanford University’s Digital Systems Laboratory in 1967 as a gift from Plessey and was still there when Hoff was doing graduate-student and post-doctoral work. In the oral-history interview he recorded for the Computer History Museum (CHM ...
o3
The machine Ted Hoff was talking about was the Plessey System 250 (often written PP-250).
What the System 250 was
• Designed in the mid-1960s by the Computer Division of the British defence and telecommunications firm Plessey.
• First described in public at the 1967 Fall Joint Computer Conference (“A Capability—Directed Addressing Architecture,” N. H. Fields & M. J. R. Healy).
• Physically ...
You need to be logged in to submit an answer