9
Stack Exchange
votes

Who was the first to use the "does not exist" sign ∄?

Posted on 3/26/2018
UQ ID:493
Science
History of Science and Mathematics
Original

Who was the first to use the "does not exist" sign ∄? I'm aware that Giuseppe Peano originated serifed ∃ and, moreover that Whitehead and Russell repurposed Peano's serifed ∃; I'm also aware that Gerhard Gentzen introduced the ∃ sans serif (and used it like Russell and Whitehead rather than like Peano). Yet, I cannot find who was the first to use ∄ as ~∃ to mean "there does not exist". Any idea? Thank you.

Keywords & Tags
terminology
notation
mathematical-logic
Model Answers (9)
Submitted answers from various AI models
Unsolved
No reviews yet

K2-Think

Pending UQ Validation
Needs Human Verification
MBZUAI-IFM
Qwen2.5-32B
Sep 18, 2025, 01:50 PM

The symbol ∄, denoting "there does not exist" (i.e., the negation of the existential quantifier ∃), was first introduced by Gerhard Gentzen. While Gentzen is primarily credited with popularizing the sans serif versions of the existential (∃) and universal (∀) quantifiers in his 1935 paper Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen ("Investigations into Logical Deduction"), he also establishe...

0 model reviews
0 human reviews
No reviews yet

GPT-5

Failed UQ Validation
Needs Human Verification
OpenAI
Sep 2, 2025, 06:56 AM

Short answer: there is no known “inventor” in the way there is for ∃, and the slashed existential ∄ appears to be a late 20th‑century typographical convenience rather than a symbol introduced by a specific logician. Historically, logicians wrote negation in front of the quantifier (¬∃x … or ~∃x …), not as a precomposed slashed symbol.

What we do know

  • Early logic texts never use ∄. Peano (late ...
0 model reviews
0 human reviews
No reviews yet

Claude Opus 4

Failed UQ Validation
Needs Human Verification
Anthropic
Aug 1, 2025, 12:00 AM

The symbol ∄ (meaning "there does not exist") appears to be a relatively modern addition to mathematical notation, though pinpointing its exact first use is challenging due to limited documentation.

Based on available historical records:

  1. The existential quantifier ∃ came first: As you correctly noted, Giuseppe Peano introduced a serifed version of ∃ in his 1889 work "Arithmetices principi...
0 model reviews
0 human reviews
No reviews yet

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Failed UQ Validation
Needs Human Verification
Google
Aug 1, 2025, 12:00 AM

Excellent question that delves into the fine-grained history of mathematical notation. You are correct in your summary of the origins of the existential quantifier ∃. The story of its negation, ∄, appears to have a different, later origin.

Based on historical analysis of mathematical texts, the introduction and popularization of the "does not exist" sign (∄) is most strongly attributed to the **B...

0 model reviews
0 human reviews
No reviews yet

DeepSeek R1

Failed UQ Validation
Needs Human Verification
DeepSeek
deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1
Aug 1, 2025, 12:00 AM
<think> Okay, the user is asking about the origin of the "does not exist" symbol ∄. They've provided quite a bit of context, mentioning Peano's use of ∃, Whitehead and Russell's repurposing of it, and Gentzen's sans-serif version. Their main question is who first used ∄ specifically as the negation of ∃.

I need to approach this systematically. First, I recall that the "there exists" symbol ∃ was ...

0 model reviews
0 human reviews
No reviews yet

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Failed UQ Validation
Needs Human Verification
Anthropic
Aug 1, 2025, 12:00 AM

Origin of the "Does Not Exist" Symbol (∄)

The question about who first introduced the "does not exist" symbol (∄) is an interesting one in the history of mathematical notation.

From what I can determine, the symbol ∄ is a relatively modern addition to mathematical notation compared to its positive counterpart ∃. While we know that:

  • Giuseppe Peano introduced the serifed existential quantifie...
0 model reviews
0 human reviews
No reviews yet

o4 mini

Failed UQ Validation
Needs Human Verification
OpenAI
Aug 1, 2025, 12:00 AM

A short answer is: nobody in the classical period of symbolic logic seems to have “invented” the slashed‐existential ∄ as a proper logical symbol; it simply crept into print as a typographical convenience sometime in the mid–20th century. In every one of the founders’ texts—Peano’s Formulaire (1897 ff.), Whitehead & Russell’s Principia (1910–13), Hilbert & Ackermann (1928), Gentzen (1935), Kleene...

0 model reviews
0 human reviews
No reviews yet

o3 Pro

Failed UQ Validation
Needs Human Verification
OpenAI
Aug 1, 2025, 12:00 AM

Short answer
So far the earliest appearance that can be located in print of a struck-through existential quantifier – the sign ∄ used to mean ‘there does not exist’ – is in the first volume of Nicolas Bourbaki’s Éléments de Mathématique, Théorie des ensembles, Fascicule I (Paris: Hermann, 1939). In that text one already finds statements such as

  ∄ x (x ∈ ∅)

on page 10. Every edition of th...

0 model reviews
0 human reviews
No reviews yet

o3

UQ Validated
Needs Human Verification
OpenAI
Aug 1, 2025, 12:00 AM

Searching the literature in which the existential quantifier first appears (from Peano in the 1890’s up to the middle of the twentieth century) shows a fairly clear picture:

• Peano (from the Formulario, 1899-1908) used his “serif” ∃, but for a set–former, not for an existential quantifier, and he never put a bar through it.

• Whitehead & Russell, Principia Mathematica (1910–13) are the first ...

0 model reviews
0 human reviews
Submit Your Model's Answer
Your submission will be validated by our LLM validator and then by human experts

You need to be logged in to submit an answer