Conjecture: No positive integer can be written as in more than one way
Conjecture: No positive integer can be written as
Today, I came up with the following problem when trying to solve this.
Are there distinct integers
I claim that the answer is No, but I think solving this is beyond my knowledge. For a very preliminary observation, the simplest case is to consider the powers of
PARI/GP code is intfun(a,b,m,n)={for(i=2,a,for(j=2,b,for(k=2,m,for(l=2,n,if(i<>k && i<>l && j<>k && j<>l && i^j+j^i-k^l-l^k==0,print(i," ",j," ",k," ",l))))));}
No solutions have been found up to
K2-Think
The problem asks whether there exist distinct integers (a, b, m, n > 1) such that (a^b + b^a = m^n + n^m). Through analyzing small values, examining the growth rates of the exponential and polynomial terms, and considering modular arithmetic and symmetry, we observe that:
- Symmetry and Uniqueness for Fixed (a): The function (f(a, b) = a^b + b^a) is symmetric in (a) and (b). For ...
GPT-5
Short answer: No proof is known. Your conjecture appears to be open. Below are some necessary conditions and reductions that any putative counterexample would have to satisfy, along with a few useful lemmas and constraints that explain why collisions (if any) are extremely rare.
- Symmetry and ordering
- The expression is symmetric in the pair, so we may assume 2 ≤ a ≤ b and 2 ≤ m ≤ n. A collisi...
Claude Opus 4
This is an interesting conjecture that appears to be open. Let me analyze what we know and what makes this problem challenging.
The Conjecture
Conjecture: For distinct positive integers
Why This is Difficult
- Growth rates: The function
grows extremely rapidly, making computational sear...
o3 Pro
Let
S(a , b) := a^b + b^a ( 1 < a , b ∈ ℤ ).
Trivially S(a , b) = S(b , a).
Your question is whether there are two different ordered pairs of
integers
(a , b) ≠ (m , n) , a , b , m , n > 1 , a ≠ b , m ≠ n ,
such that (1)
S(a , b) = S(m , n).
In other words, can the same integer be written as a^...
o3
Nobody knows the answer at the moment.
If we set
F(a , b) = a^b + b^a ( 2 ≤ a ≤ b )
and we ask whether two different pairs (a , b) , (m , n) with {a , b} ≠ {m , n} can satisfy F(a , b)=F(m , n), the problem is open. Up-to-date literature on exponential Diophantine equations does not contain a proof either way and no counter–example has ever been published.
What is known so far ...
DeepSeek R1
First, I should understand the behavior of the function f(a,b) = a^b + b^a. Since a and b are symmetric in a way, but...
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Excellent question! This is a fascinating conjecture. The short answer is that this is a known open problem in number theory. Your conjecture that there are no such integers is widely believed to be true, but a proof has remained elusive.
Let's break down why this problem is so difficult and what is known about it.
Summary of the Situation
- Conjecture: There are no distinct sets o...
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Uniqueness of a^b+b^a Representations in Number Theory
This is an interesting conjecture about whether any positive integer can be represented as
Analyzing the Problem
The question asks: Are there distinct integers
Let me approach this systematically:
Growth Rate Analysis
For integers...
o4 mini
No‐one has ever found a “non‐trivial’’ solution (i.e. with all four of a,b,m,n > 1 and the unordered pairs {a,b} ≠ {m,n}) to
a^b + b^a = m^n + n^m.
In fact
- The only obvious “collision’’ is the symmetry (a,b) ↔ (b,a), which of course gives a^b + b^a = b^a + a^b. If you allow 1 as one of the exponents you get the trivial 1^n + n^1 = n + 1 = 1^(n+1) + (n+1)^1, ...
You need to be logged in to submit an answer