Computability of a "weird" set
Computability of a "weird" set
The starting point of this question is the observation that the smallest positive integers
are absurdly high. This leads to the following general question: Is the set
K2-Think
The set ( C ) is computable.
To determine if a given ( n \in \mathbb{N} \setminus {0} ) is in ( C ), we need to check if there exist positive integers ( a, b, c ) satisfying ( \frac{a}{b+c} + \frac{b}{a+c} + \frac{c}{a+b} = n ). Through transformation, this equation can be rephrased in terms of ( x = b+c ), ( y = a+c ), ( z = a+b ), leading to the Diophantine equation:
[ (x +...
GPT-5
Short answer: We can semi-decide membership in C (i.e., C is computably enumerable), but whether C is decidable is currently unknown. Under standard number-theoretic conjectures (e.g., Birch–Swinnerton-Dyer plus finiteness of the Tate–Shafarevich group), C would be decidable.
Details:
- Turning the condition into a polynomial Diophantine equation
Let E(a,b,c) = a/(b+c) + b/(a+c) + c/(a+b). The...
o3 Pro
Let
S(a ,b ,c ) = a/(b+c) + b/(a+c) + c/(a+b)
and
C = { n ≥ 1 : ∃ a ,b ,c ≥ 1 S(a ,b ,c ) = n } .
-
The problem is equivalent to a single polynomial equation
F(a ,b ,c ,n) = 0 ,
where F is obtained by clearing the denominators:
a(a+b)(a+c) + b(a+b)(b+c) + c(a+c)(b+c)– n (a+b)(a+c)(b+c) = 0 .
Expanding, F is an integral polynomial of total degre...
o4 mini
First, rewrite the defining condition
n ∈ C ⟺ ∃ a,b,c∈ℕ₊ : a/(b+c) + b/(a+c) + c/(a+b) = n.
Clearing denominators gives a single homogeneous cubic Diophantine equation
F(a,b,c,n) = a(a+c)(a+b) + b(b+c)(b+a) + c(c+a)(c+b) – n·(a+b)(b+c)(c+a) = 0.
Hence
(i) C is clearly recursively enumerable: on input n, dovetail all triples (a,b,c), check F(a,b,c,n)=0, and halt if ...
o3
Let
a b c
E(a,b,c) = ─── + ─── + ─── . b+c a+c a+b
For every positive integer n let
F n (X,Y,Z) = n(Y+Z)(X+Z)(X+Y)
– X(X+Z)(X+Y)
– Y(Y+Z)(X+Y)
– Z(Y+Z)(X+Z) (1)
and put
C = { n ≥ 1 : F n (a,b,c)=0 has a solution
a,b,c ∈ ℕ, a,b...
Gemini 2.5 Pro
This is an excellent question that connects a seemingly simple number theory problem to the foundations of computability theory.
Here is a breakdown of the answer, structured into two parts:
- Showing that the set
is computably enumerable (also known as recursively enumerable or semidecidable). - Arguing that the set
is not computable (or decidable).
Summary
The set
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Computability of a "Weird" Set
This question explores the computability of a set defined by a specific Diophantine equation. Let me analyze this thoroughly.
Understanding the Problem
The set
We're told that the smallest solution...
DeepSeek R1
[\frac{a}{b+c} + \frac{b}{a+c} + \frac{c}{a+b} = n]
The question mentions that for n=4, the smallest solutions are very large, which is interesting but might not directly help with computability.
First, I should understan...
Claude Opus 4
This is an interesting question about the computability of a set defined by a Diophantine-like condition. Let me analyze this carefully.
Analysis of the Set C
The set C consists of all positive integers n such that the equation
Key Observations
- Clearing denominators: Multiplying thr...
You need to be logged in to submit an answer