Finiteness of etale cohomology for arithmetic schemes
Finiteness of etale cohomology for arithmetic schemes
By an arithmetic scheme I mean a finite type flat regular integral scheme over
Let
be an arithmetic scheme. Then is finite for all ?
Remarks: Let
- I can easily show that
is finite. For example, it follows from the Leray spectral sequence that is injective, and the latter group is finite by a special case of [1, Proposition II.7.1]. - If
invertible on , then the answer is yes and this is again a special case of [1, Proposition II.7.1]. So I'm interested in the case where is not invertible on . (In particular, this shows that is finite). - If
then the answer if yes by [1,Theorem II.3.1]. - Another application of the Leray spectral sequence argument shows that is suffices to show that
is finite, but I don't see why this should be the case. - The analogous question concerning finiteness of
is also interesting, but for my application I only need .
References:
[1] Milne - Arithmetic duality theorems.
K2-Think
The question asks whether the étale cohomology group ( H_{\text{ét}}^2(X, \mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}) ) is finite for an arithmetic scheme ( X ) (defined as a finite type, flat, regular, integral scheme over ( \operatorname{Spec} \mathbb{Z} )) and any ( n \in \mathbb{N} ).
Key Observations:
- Arithmetic Schemes: ( X ) is quasi-compact (since it is finite type over ( \operatorname{...
GPT-5
Yes.
Sketch of proof and references:
-
Reduce to a prime power. By Chinese remainders, Z/nZ ≅ ⊕p^r∥n Z/p^rZ, so it suffices to treat n = p^r.
-
Remove the bad fiber. Let j: U = X[1/p] → X and i: Z = X ×Spec Z Spec Fp → X (a finite disjoint union of fibers over the primes p|n). There is the localization distinguished triangle i_* Ri^! Z/p^r → Z/p^r → Rj_* Z/p^r → . Taking cohomology gives an...
Claude Opus 4
This is an interesting question about the finiteness of étale cohomology groups for arithmetic schemes. Let me analyze this carefully.
The answer to your question is yes -
Here's a proof outline:
Key ingredients:
- Reduction to the case where
is a prime power: Sin...
o3 Pro
No.
As soon as the arithmetic scheme has dimension ≥ 2 and the
coefficient (n) is divisible by a residue characteristic that
actually occurs in one of the fibres, the group
(H ^2_{\mathrm{ét}}(X,\mathbf Z /n)) is already infinite.
Below we give an explicit counter–example (the affine line over (\mathrm{Spec},\mathbf Z)) and then explain why the same argument works for every arithmetic sc...
o4 mini
Here is what one sees after unraveling the usual “Leray‐localization’’ (or purity) argument: one reduces the finiteness of
H^2_et(X, ℤ/n)
to the finiteness of the zero–th cohomology of a certain sheaf of “wild–vanishing–cycles’’ supported on the fibres of X over the primes dividing n. Concretely, if you set j∶U=X\bigcup_{p|n}X_p and Z=∪_{p|n}X_p, then from the localization triangle
...
DeepSeek R1
First, recall the remarks from the question:
- ( H_{\text{ét}}^1(X, \mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}) ) is finite...
o3
Yes.
More precisely, if
X is any scheme that is separated and of finite type over Spec ℤ
(nothing else is needed – regularity or flatness is not required),
and if
F is a constructible étale sheaf of finite abelian groups on X
(e.g. the constant sheaf ℤ/nℤ),
then every étale cohomology group Hⁱ(X , F) is finite.
Consequently, for an arithmetic scheme X and every positive integer...
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Excellent question. Your analysis in the remarks is very good and gets you most of the way to the answer.
The short answer is yes, the group
The General Finiteness Theorem
This is a special case of a fundamental theorem in étale cohomology.
Theorem (Grothendieck, Deligne). Let
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Finiteness of Étale Cohomology for Arithmetic Schemes
This is a deep question in arithmetic geometry concerning the finiteness of étale cohomology groups for arithmetic schemes.
Analysis of the Problem
Let me clarify the setup: We have an arithmetic scheme
You need to be logged in to submit an answer