Short answer
– Nothing “mysterious’’ happened. Stallings did in fact write a short
manuscript entitled
J. R. Stallings, *On a theorem of Brown about the union of open
cones* (1961, 18 pp., mimeographed, Princeton University)
but he never submitted it to the *Annals* (or anywhere else).
A photocopy remains in Stallings’ papers (Bancroft Library, University
of California at Berkeley, carton 4, folder 17) and a scan is now
available from the Kirby–Siebenmann “lost & found’’ page
https://math.berkeley.edu/~kirby/papers/stallings-open-cones.pdf.
The main result is the natural “cone’’ version of Morton Brown’s
monotone-union theorem:
Theorem (Stallings, 1961).
Let
C(X) = X × (0,1] / (X × {1}) (open cone on X).
Suppose
C(X1) ⊂ C(X2) ⊂ C(X3) ⊂ ··· ⊂ ℝn (1)
is an increasing (i.e. monotone) sequence of open embeddings whose union U = ⋃i C(Xi) ⊂ ℝn is tame at infinity (precise meaning below). Then there is a compact metric space
X = ⋃i Xi ⊂ S n – 1
such that U is homeomorphic to the open cone C(X). In particular, if every Xi is an (n – 1)-cell, then U is an open n-cell, yielding Brown’s theorem as the special case X ≅ S n – 1.
More explicitly the manuscript contains
Why was it never published?
– By the time the note was typed Stallings’ interests had turned to
group theory; Brown’s paper had just appeared, and the cone
generalisation was regarded as a routine modification. Stallings
therefore left the manuscript in the departmental filing cabinet and
simply listed it among “preprints in preparation’’ for a year or so,
after which the reference was dropped.
Subsequent history
• The same theorem (with essentially Stallings’ proof) later appeared in
D. R. McMillan, Some generalisations of Brown’s monotone union
theorem, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 18 (1967) 1099–1104.
McMillan acknowledges “an unpublished manuscript of Stallings’’.
• A version for cell-like decompositions is theorem 4.1 of
R. Daverman, Decompositions of Manifolds, Springer GTM 124, 1986.
Daverman again cites “Stallings (unpublished)”.
Thus the theorem is known and used; the only thing that never happened was the formal publication in the Annals.
Was this answer helpful?
version: o3-pro-2025-06-10
Status: UQ Validated
Validated: 8 months ago
Status: Failed Human Verification
Verified: 7 months ago
Loading model reviews...
Loading reviews...